Perhaps you could expand on this by explaining more about your idea of bliss?

I didn't feel berated as such, but it did seem as if you were offended or annoyed by what I said. I think perhaps I ought to clarify a little further: it's not that I look forward to death, or that I don't try my best to avoid it. It's simply that after thinking about it, I've decided that I would prefer oblivion to eternal life.

My idea of bliss would be to exist forever, no matter what sort of reality I would find myself in. Judging from your responses, the thought of existing forever is painful to you. The thought of getting bored with existence, having regrets over what you did or did not do previously, etc, sounds like it would be your idea of torture or Hell.

The only thing I find offensive or annoying in this world are those who refuse to change their viewpoint, even if they have been proven utterly wrong. In short, the willingly ignorant. Those who throw their opinions around without being willing to change them...These are the ones I cannot stand.

...unbaptized babies were sent to Limbo, not Heaven, even though they had never harmed another person or thought evil thoughts.

I'd like to hear a theist's perspective on the subject of Limbo.

I have a hunch that 90% of all Christians don't really believe in heaven and hell anyway (This bullshit statistic was brought to you by the makers of the Magic Bullet theory.) Since heaven is just a way to make Christians feel better about dieing, a place like Limbo can be dreamed up to serve a similar function. At this point, I think people know this stuff is made up, but believe it anyway because they are scared of the alternative (No one loves you, etc.)

unbaptised infants spend eternity but without communion with God.

Deciding that limbo, a concept which had been sold as fact for centuries, in fact does not exist.

I'm not talking about people like myself who choose not to believe, but people who have truly never heard of the Bible. This situation is what I believe keeps the belief in Purgatory alive.

The apostle Paul stated that the people who were not given the word of God originally (called Gentiles in the text) were still able to see evidences of God through nature.

The Catholic Church is not all of Christianity.

Now, this boils down to what each individual interprets from the same data, sure. Not everyone sees nature and thinks "a god must have created this." However, even an extremely dull person can observe and come to conclusions, whether or not they are the correct conclusions is a different story. In short, there is evidence for a deity, should a person look and see it that way.

Those scientific theories that have yet to be proven but are widely proclaimed as fact erronously.

I certainly don't consider myself superior to other people, at least not because of my intelligence.

I don't and probably will never understand how you can stand just having faith that it is as your diety has said.

They have yet to be observed and proven.

As for evolution, it has in fact been observed, most famously in the case of peppered moths, and in bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics.

there is plenty of evidence in the anatomy of animals to suggest that they all have a common ancestor.

This is just natural selection within a species. The moths do not "evolve" to become black. The black moths merely are able to reproduce more and create a larger part of the population. It's not as if the species is changing. It's merely a natural segment of the species that survives longer, but that doesn't mean the species has changed.